May 2009


A lot of conservatives simply use the term liberal to refer to anyone who disagrees with their conservative beliefs.  In the second chapter of A Theology of the Old Testament Bruce Waltke gives an excellent definition of liberal and three considerations that describe liberalism.    

Definition:  ”By  ”liberals” I mean here those who put reason above revelation and even more specifically embrace historical criticism and so set another canon above the Bible-namely, a set of a priori assumptions derived from the Enlightenment, whereby they critique the biblical content, especially with regard to historical accuracy.” (73)

Three considerations: “First, liberals read the Bible under the canon of skepticism, that is, with the same skepticism they apply to any other ancient Near Eastern myth”

“Second, liberal theologians read the Bible under the canon of coherence, which assumes there is an inexorable “natural” nexus between every effect and its cause.”

“Third, these liberals apply the canon of analogy, which assumes that nothing happened in the past that does not happen in the present, such as rising from the dead or ascending into heaven.” (74)

I think this definition and these considerations are a much better way to use the term liberal that it is commonly used in evangelicalism.

One of the most profitable changes in my  life since I began my journey to a deeper and more holistic understanding of the Gospel and the Christian faith a few years ago  is a greater appreciation for art. Previously the value I placed on art was only for its aesthetic value, as decoration or a simple illustration of an event.  I only saw value in pieces I personally liked.

Two of my professors at Cedarville had a profound impact on me in this area.  My philosophy professor, whose expertise was in philosophy of art, allowed me to sit in on his Philosophy of Art class and the section in Humanities when he lectured.  Understanding the different uses of light, color, shape and perspective allowed me to see paintings and sculptures in a whole new way.  In addition to these new skills for interpreting art, in a Prison Epistles class, while discussing the apocalyptic prayers in in all four letters, one of my NT profs commented on the apocalyptic role of artists in today’s world.  While certainly recognizing that special revelation from God is categorically different from human interpretation, he explained how he thought artists can be quite revelatory for society.  I do not remember his exact words, I probably did not realize what effect they would have in me at the time, but he described artists as people who are often able to see the world in different way than is normally portrayed or understood and then through their medium explain their view to others.  I have found this description of art to very helpful.  When I see a painting or sculpture or listen to a poem or song with a message, I now try to understand then through this lens. Questions such as “How does this artist see the world?”  and “How does this piece view the topic at hand differently than it is usually portrayed?” are now the criteria for my evaluation of art.  

However, I am not figured out how art should be incorporated in the life of the Church.  Obviously, we use music in our praise of God in our corporate worship.  But how does music, that does not directly sing praise to God, fit into our Christian communities.  Bach saw all of his music as his offering of worship to God. Outside of individual enjoyment and reflection, how does the Church as a corporate body appreciate the beauty of Bach and allow his music to enrich life and motivate us to love God.  In addition, how do we incorporate popular music that can show us life and the world in a way we usually do not see.  

How does the great history of art in the Church fit into our communities?  Are there ways to use some of the deeply theological painting of Rembrandt to help us understand the Biblical text through his medium?  Are there ways that Salvador Dali or Jackson Pollack can show us the world in a way that we might not see it otherwise?

What about “secular” literature or film?  The novels of Faukner and McCarthy have some deep personal, societal, social and even theological issues involved.  Speaking of McCarthy, what about Cohen brother’s films?  And as I have mentioned before, The Dark Knight is overflowing with Gospel themes.

Now I am not saying that these artistic offerings should replace our exposition of the Scriptures or be treated as authoritative.  Nor am I saying that all art is useful or encouraging.  But it seems that there needs to be more Church community engagement with the thoughts, ideas and worldviews of artists.  If anything it just seems to reinforce the necessity of a fuller understanding of life, community and culture for Christian living and Church life.  But how we should do this is still not clear.

Does anyone know whether the Wycliffe Exegetical Commentary Series is defunk?  I have been using the volume on Nahum, Habakkuk and Zephaniah for a paper and found it to be superb!  I know Moo has a volume on Romans 1-8, does anybody know if that is simply the same as the first 8 chapters in his NICNT volume?

Check out reflective-praxis for the most recent book giveaway.  Make sure you have some good book suggestions on Luke/Acts.  You can see my thoughts already in the comments

I am working on a paper comparing Hab 2.4 in the interpretation of Qumran and Paul.  As I read Habakkuk I was stuck again by Hab 1.5 “Look at the nations and watch -and be utterly amazed. For I am going to do something in your days, that you would not believe, even if you were told.”

While Jer 29.11 is the king of mis-quoted exile passages, I have heard Hab 1.15 used as the key verse for mission trips or other ministry events a few times.  I am surprised it is not used more though.  There is nothing more motivating than a verse foretelling how people from southern Iraq will take over the world and punish your people for their wickedness.

God the Father

Holy Spirit
Jesus

I would like to thank the wonderful people at InterVarsity Press for these review copies.

Christopher Wright’s trilogy of Knowing God the Father Through the Old Testament, Knowing Jesus Through the Old Testament and Knowing God the Holy Spirit Through the Old Testament allow the reader to enter into the study of the Old Testament on level beyond moralizing of narratives or the endless search for “new” Messianic prophecies.  While the subject of the three books are obviously the three person of the Trinity, these books do not only discuss the theology of the persons but touch on nearly all areas of relevant Old Testament theology.  The set began with Knowing Jesus in 1992 and the reception over the next 14 years seemed to be so positive Wright was prompted to produce Knowing the Holy Spirit in 2006 and Knowing God the Father in 2007. (more…)

Why aren’t there more OT commentary series?  Eerdmans has 2 NT only series, Pillar and NIGTC, but no OT only series.  Baker has a full NT series, BECNT, and only an OT series on the Psalms and Wisdom books.  It seems the only broadly evangelical OT series are NICOT and WBC.  Why has there not been another OT series in the past 30 years?  There have been some good updates to the Anchor, Hermeneia, ICC and Old Testament Library, but most of the volumes in those series are older and so bogged down in source criticism, form criticism and endless linguistical matters that it is nearly impossible to get an idea about the author’s understanding of the text.  I think there is a huge opportunity here for another publishing company to come out with new high level, text serious OT commentary series.  Zondervan, IVP or Hendrickson could make a huge impact on Eerdmans’ commentary dominance if they were to develop a new high level OT set.

1-peterSorry it took me so long, I had finals that needed to study for this weekend. The winner of the WBC  1 Peter commentary is Nick Norelli.  Thanks to those who took part!

1-peterSomehow I ended up with an extra copy of J. Ramsey Michaels commentary on 1 Peter in the Word Biblical Commentary Series.  So I decided to give it away to one of my few, but loyal, readers!  Here are the rules:

1. Write a post about this giveaway and link to this post on your blog – 1 point

2. Add Text, Community & Mission to your blogroll and let me know via comment – 5 points (If I am already on your blogroll, let me know for 5 points)

3. For every referral WordPress tracks from your blog to mine you will receive 1 point

4.  Whoever has the most points by midnight next Friday May 8th will win!

5. Sorry US residents only (But still feel free to announce it).

6. If you do not win the book, consider buying it from the WTS bookstore.  It is well worth the price, Michaels and Davids in NICNT are the best Evangelical 1 Peter commentaries.

Have at it!